Thanks to GoldHaven Resources for sponsoring today’s video. You can get their latest presentation here on their website: https://goldhaven-presentation.com/the-next-news-network
Tickers: CSE: GOH | OTCQB: GHVNF
“Section 230 is a defense, not immunity.” That ruling just rocked Meta, Facebook, and Big Tech.
In this explosive conservative news breakdown, we cover the court bombshell behind 230 IS NO IMMUNITY: META BUSTED IN COURT and why Jason Fyk says the courthouse door may finally be reopening against Meta, Facebook, and the Silicon Valley censorship machine. For years, Big Tech lawyers pushed the idea that Section 230 gave platforms near-total immunity from suit, and too many judges repeated that claim as if it were settled gospel. Now the Ninth Circuit is drawing a line, making clear that Section 230 is a defense to liability, not automatic protection from being sued in the first place.
That distinction matters for far more than legal theory. It goes to the heart of whether Americans harmed by platform censorship, business interference, speech suppression, and online blacklisting can even get discovery, take depositions, and force companies like Meta to answer questions under oath. Jason Fyk spent years fighting Facebook in court while his claims were shut down before discovery, before amendment, and before the full facts could come out. This video lays out how Meta allegedly used repetition, intimidation, and procedural shields to keep scrutiny away from what happened to Fyk’s business, audience, and livelihood.
We also connect this court fight to the larger censorship war involving Google, YouTube, Mark Zuckerberg, Section 230 reform, First Amendment concerns, tech monopolies, and allegations of political bias against conservatives, patriots, and independent media. From the Trump era battles over Big Tech censorship to whistleblower claims about algorithm manipulation and content throttling, this story fits the bigger pattern America First viewers already recognize: powerful platforms shaping speech, news, money, and public opinion while hiding behind legal myths.
If Meta can no longer yell “Section 230” and escape before the facts come out, the entire censorship cartel could face a new era of accountability. Watch closely, because what happened in this case may be the crack in Big Tech’s shield that changes everything.
This video was conducted on behalf of GoldHaven Resources Corp, and was funded by PANAM MARKETING. I have been compensated for this video. I only express my opinion based on my experience. Your experience may be different. These videos are for educational and inspirational purposes only. Investing of any kind involves risk. While it is possible to minimize risk, your investments are solely your responsibility. It is imperative that you conduct your own research. There is no guarantee of gains or losses on investments. Please do your own due diligence. I am not a financial advisor, and this is not a financial advice channel. All information is provided strictly for educational purposes. It does not take into account anybody’s specific circumstances or situation. If you are making investment or other financial management decisions and require advice, please consult a suitably qualified licensed professional. The securities of GoldHaven Resources Corp are speculative, and the company has not yet achieved consistent positive cash flow from operations. As a growth stage company, it anticipates negative cash flow for the foreseeable future as it focuses on development and commercialization efforts. Parties viewing this video should thoroughly review the company’s public disclosure and documents available on sedarplus.ca.
See full disclaimer here: http://ds.panam.marketing/goldhaven
